Descent Into Discourse The Reification of Language and the Writing of Social History Critical theory is no substitute for historical materialism language is not life With this statement Bryan Palmer enters the debate that is now transforming and disrupting a number of academic discip

  • Title: Descent Into Discourse: The Reification of Language and the Writing of Social History
  • Author: Bryan D. Palmer
  • ISBN: 9780877227205
  • Page: 498
  • Format: Paperback
  • Critical theory is no substitute for historical materialism language is not life With this statement, Bryan Palmer enters the debate that is now transforming and disrupting a number of academic disciplines, including political science, women s studies, and history Focusing on the ways in which literary or critical theory is being promoted within the field of social hi Critical theory is no substitute for historical materialism language is not life With this statement, Bryan Palmer enters the debate that is now transforming and disrupting a number of academic disciplines, including political science, women s studies, and history Focusing on the ways in which literary or critical theory is being promoted within the field of social history, he argues forcefully that the current reliance on poststructuralism with its reification of discourse and avoidance of the structures of oppression and struggles of resistance obscures the origins, meanings, and consequences of historical events and processes.Palmer is concerned with the emergence of language as a central focus of intellectual work in the twentieth century He locates the implosion of theory that moved structuralism in the direction of poststructuralism and deconstruction in what he calls the descent into discourse Few historians who champion poststructuralist thought, according to Palmer, appreciate historical materialism s capacity to address discourse meaningfully Nor do many of the advocates of language within the field of social history have an adequate grounding in the theoretical making of the project they champion so ardently Palmer roots his polemical challenge in an effort to introduce historians fully to the theoretical writing that many are alluding to and drawing from rather cavalierly Acknowledging that critical theory can contribute to an understanding of some aspects of the past, Palmer nevertheless argues for the centrality of materialism to the project of history In specific discussions of how critical theory is constructing histories of politics, class, and gender, he traces the development of the descent into discourse within social history, mapping the limitations of recent revisionist texts Much of this writing, he contends, is undertheorized and represents a problematic retreat from prior histories that attempted to address such material forces as economic structures, political power, and class struggle.Descent into Discourse counters current intellectual fashion with an eloquent argument for the necessity to analyze and appreciate lived experience and the structures of subordination and power in any quest for historical meaning.

    • Free Read [Travel Book] Ù Descent Into Discourse: The Reification of Language and the Writing of Social History - by Bryan D. Palmer ✓
      498 Bryan D. Palmer
    • thumbnail Title: Free Read [Travel Book] Ù Descent Into Discourse: The Reification of Language and the Writing of Social History - by Bryan D. Palmer ✓
      Posted by:Bryan D. Palmer
      Published :2019-03-20T20:22:45+00:00

    About "Bryan D. Palmer"

    1. Bryan D. Palmer

      Bryan D. Palmer Is a well-known author, some of his books are a fascination for readers like in the Descent Into Discourse: The Reification of Language and the Writing of Social History book, this is one of the most wanted Bryan D. Palmer author readers around the world.

    661 thoughts on “Descent Into Discourse: The Reification of Language and the Writing of Social History”

    1. I read this in my historiography class.The professor assigned it because he knew we'd hate it.We did!We voted it "most likely to be burned in a trash can."Seriously, it's a critique of deconstructionist history by an unreformed Marxist who thinks Trotsky is the greatest thinker of the twentieth century. Oh yes, and he can't write a clear sentence to save his life.I don't think I've ever read a book I hated more.


    2. Marxist historian brings this late cold war polemic against the linguistic turn in the writing of history, bringing his critique to bear specifically on post-structuralist developments.Opening section gives a whirlwind tour of the linguistic turn itself, beginning with the nietzschean prototype, moving through Saussure, the Bakhtin circle, and the Prague circle before getting hot under the collar for Levi-Strauss, Barthes, Althusser, Foucault, Lacan, and Derrida, then ending with a critique of d [...]


    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *